翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Who Built the Buildings?
・ Who Came First
・ Who Can I Run To
・ Who Can I Turn To (album)
・ Who Can I Turn To?
・ Who Can It Be Now?
・ Who Can Kill a Child?
・ Who Can Know It?
・ Who Can Say What's True?
・ Who Can See It
・ Who Can You Trust?
・ Who Can You Trust? (album)
・ Who Cares
・ Who Cares (1925 film)
・ Who Cares a Lot?
Who Cares if You Listen
・ Who Cares? (1919 film)
・ Who Cares? (ballet)
・ Who Cares? (Gershwin song)
・ Who Cares? (Gnarls Barkley song)
・ Who Censored Roger Rabbit?
・ WHO Centre for Health Development
・ WHO classification of the tumors of the central nervous system
・ WHO Collaborating Centres
・ WHO collaborating centres in occupational health
・ Who Controls the Internet?
・ Who Could That Be at This Hour?
・ Who Could Win a Rabbit
・ Who Covers Who?
・ Who Dares Wins


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Who Cares if You Listen : ウィキペディア英語版
Who Cares if You Listen
"Who Cares if You Listen?" is an article written by the American composer Milton Babbitt (May 10, 1916 – January 29, 2011) and published in the February, 1958 issue of ''High Fidelity''. In addition to being the single most well-known work by Babbitt, it epitomized the distance that had grown between many composers and their listeners. In the words of Anthony Tommasini in the ''New York Times'', "To this day, it is seized as evidence that he and his ilk are contemptuous of audiences" .
Babbitt was a practitioner of integral serialism, which in his hands could be a highly technical mode of musical composition. The article, which begins "This article might have been entitled 'The Composer as Specialist'", does not refer to serialism at all, but rather takes the position that "serious", "advanced" music, like advanced mathematics, philosophy, and physics, is too complex for a "normally well-educated man without special preparation" to "understand".
==The article==
In this article and throughout his writings, Babbitt's subject is "American culture, which he finds threatened by populism. It has produced little meaningful understanding of or dialogue about music, he argues, and it has forced the 'serious' and 'advanced' composer into a state of isolation" .
Babbitt describes "serious", "advanced music" as "a commodity which has little, no, or negative commodity value", and the composer of such music as, "in essence, a 'vanity' composer". It is music of which the general public is largely unaware, and in which it takes no interest. "After all, the public does have its own music, its ubiquitous music: music to eat by, to read by, to dance by..." Performers, too, are seldom interested in "advanced" music, so that it is rarely performed at all and the exceptional occasions are mainly "poorly attended concerts before an audience consisting in the main of fellow 'professionals'. At best, the music would appear to be for, of, and by specialists". Babbitt goes on to maintain, however, that music cannot "evolve" if it only attempts to appeal to "the public". "And so, I dare suggest that the composer would do himself and his music an immediate and eventual service by total, resolute, and voluntary withdrawal from this public world to one of private performance and electronic media, with its very real possibility of complete elimination of the public and social aspects of musical composition." He recognizes the practical problems for the composer of "advanced" music not patronized by the concert-going public: "But how, it may be asked, will this serve to secure the means of survival for the composer and his music? One answer is that after all such a private life is what the university provides the scholar and the scientist." He concludes: "if this () music is not supported, the whistling repertory of the man in the street will be little affected... But music will cease to evolve, and, in that important sense, will cease to live."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Who Cares if You Listen」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.